The release of fluid to the seabed from deeper sources is a process that can influence seabed geomorphology and associated habitats, with pockmarks a common indicator. In May 2012, Geoscience Australia led a multidisciplinary marine survey in Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, to facilitate an assessment of the potential for fluid leakage associated with geological storage of CO2 at depth within the Petrel Sub-basin. Multibeam bathymetry and backscatter mapping (652 km2), combined with acoustic sub-bottom profiling (655 line-km) and geomorphological and sediment characterisation of the seabed was undertaken. Seabed geomorphic environments identified from 2 m resolution bathymetry include carbonate banks and ridges, palaeochannels, pockmark fields and fields of low amplitude hummocks. This paper focuses on pockmarks as indicators of fluid seepage from the subsurface. Three principal pockmark morphologies (Type I, II and III) are present with their distribution non-random. Small unit (Type I) depressions occur on plains and in palaeochannels, but are most commonly within larger (Type II) composite pockmarks on plains. Type III pockmarks, intermediate in scale, are only present in palaeochannels. The timing of pockmark formation is constrained by radiocarbon dating to 14.5 cal ka BP, or later, when a rapid rise in sea-level would have flooded much of outer Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. Our data suggest the principal source of fluids to the seabed is from the breakdown of organic material deposited during the last glacial maxima lowstand of sea-level, and presently trapped beneath marine sediments. These results assist in ameliorating uncertainties associated with potential CO2 storage in this region.

Geoscience Australia is investigating the suitability of offshore sedimentary basins as potential CO2 storage sites. In May 2012 a seabed survey (GA0335/SOL5463) was undertaken in collaboration with the Australian Institute of Marine Science to acquire baseline marine data in the Petrel Sub-basin, Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. The aim was to collect information on possible connections (faults and fluid pathways) between the seabed and key basin units, and to characterise seabed habitats and biota. Two areas were surveyed (Area 1: 471 km2, depth ~ 80-100 m; Area 2: 181 km2, depth ~ 30-70 m), chosen to investigate the seabed over the potential supercritical CO2 boundary (Area 1) and the basin margin (Area 2), with Area 2 located around Flat Top 1 Well. Data analysed include multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter, seabed samples and their geochemical and biological properties, video footage and still images of seabed habitats and biota, and acoustic sub-bottom profiles. Pockmarks, providing evidence for fluid release, are present at the seabed, and are particularly numerous in Area 1. Area 1 is part of a sediment-starved, low-relief section of shelf characterised by seabed plains, relict estuarine paleochannels, and low-lying ridges. Facies analysis and radiocarbon dating of relict coastal plain sediment indicates Area 1 was a mangrove-rich environment around 15,500 years ago, transgressed near the end of the Last Glacial period (Meltwater Pulse 1A). Modern seabed habitats have developed on these relict geomorphic features, which have been little modified by recent seabed processes. Seabed habitats include areas of barren and bioturbated sediments, and mixed patches of sponges and octocorals on hardgrounds. In the sub-surface, stacked sequences of northwest-dipping to flat-lying, well-stratified sediments, variably incised by palaeochannels characterise the shallow geology of Area 1. Some shallow faulting through these deposits was noted, but direct linkages between seabed features and deep-seated faults were not observed. Area 2 is dominated by carbonate banks and ridges. Low-lying ridges, terraces and plains are commonly overlain by hummocky sediment of uncertain origin. Pockmarks are present on the margins of banks, and on and adjacent to ridges. Despite the co-location of banks and ridges with major faults at depth, there is a lack of direct evidence for structural connectivity, particularly because of significant acoustic masking in the sub-surface profiles of Area 2. While no direct structural relationship was observed in the acoustic sub-bottom profiles between these banks, ridges and faults visible in the basin seismic profiles, some faults extend through the upper basin units towards the seabed on the margin of Area 2. No evidence was detected at the seabed for the presence of thermogenic hydrocarbons or other fluids sourced from the basin, including beneath the CO2 supercritical boundary. The source of fluids driving pockmark formation in Area 1 is most likely decomposing mangrove-rich organic matter within late Pleistocene estuarine sediments. The gas generated is dominated by CO2. Additional fluids are potentially derived from sediment compaction and dewatering. Conceptual models derived from this are being used to inform regional-scale assessments of CO2 storage prospectivity in the Petrel Sub-basin.

Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to porosity, total chlorin and chlorin index data from the upper 2 cm of seabed sediments.

Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to geochemical data on piston core sediments collected during the GA0345/TAN1411 marine survey in the Browse Basin. These include concentrations of interstitial gases (C1 to C5, CO2) and high-molecular weight hydrocarbons.

Geological Storage Potential of CO2 & Source to Sink Matching Matching of CO2 sources with CO2 storage opportunities (known as source to sink matching), requires identification of the optimal locations for both the emission source and storage site for CO2 emissions. The choice of optimal sites is a complex process and can not be solely based on the best technical site for storage, but requires a detailed assessment of source issues, transport links and integration with economic and environmental factors. Many assessments of storage capacity of CO2 in geological formations have been made at a regional or global level. The level of detail and assessment methods vary substantially, from detailed attempts to count the actual storage volume at a basinal or prospect level, to more simplistic and ?broad brush? approaches that try to estimate the potential worldwide (Bradshaw et al, 2003). At the worldwide level, estimates of the CO2 storage potential are often quoted as ?very large? with ranges for the estimates in the order of 100?s to 10,000?s Gt of CO2 (Beecy and Kuuskra, 2001; Bruant et al, 2002; Bradshaw et al 2003). Identifying a large global capacity to store CO2 is only a part of the solution to the CO2 storage problem. If the large storage capacity can not be accessed because it is too distant from the source, or is associated with large technical uncertainty, then it may not be possible to reliably predict that it would ever be of value when making assessments. To ascertain whether any potential storage capacity could ever be actually utilised requires analysis of numerous other factors. Within the GEODISC program of the Australian Petroleum Cooperative Research Centre (APCRC), Geoscience Australia (GA) and the University of New South Wales (UNSW) completed an analysis of the potential for the geological storage of CO2. Over 100 potential Environmentally Sustainable Sites for CO2 Injection (ESSCIs) were assessed by applying a deterministic risk assessment (Bradshaw et al, 2002). At a regional scale Australia has a risked capacity for CO2 storage potential in excess of 1600 years of current annual total net emissions. However, this estimate does not incorporate the various factors that are required in source to sink matching. If these factors are included, and an assumption is made that some economic imperative will apply to encourage geological storage of CO2, then a more realistic analysis can be derived. In such a case, Australia may have the potential to store a maximum of 25% of our total annual net emissions, or approximately 100 - 115 Mt CO2 per year.

Poster for 2008 CO2CRC Symposium.

Within the GEODISC program of the Australian Petroleum Cooperative Research Centre (APCRC), Geoscience Australia (GA) and the University of New South Wales (UNSW) completed an analysis of the potential for the geological storage of CO2. The geological analysis produced an assessment from over 100 potential Environmentally Sustainable Sites for CO2 Injection (ESSCI) by applying a deterministic risk assessment. Out of 100 potential sites, 65 proved to be valid sites for further study. This assessment examined predominantly saline reservoirs which is where we believe Australia?s greatest storage potential exists. However, many of these basins also contain coal seams that may be capable of storing CO2. Several of these coal basins occur close to coal-fired power plants and oil and gas fields where high levels of CO2 are emitted. CO2 storage in coal beds is intrinsically different to storage in saline formations, and different approaches need to be applied when assessing them. Whilst potentially having economic benefit, enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) production through CO2 injection does raise an issue of how much greenhouse gas mitigation might occur. Even if only small percentages of the total methane are liberated to the atmosphere in the process, then a worse outcome could be achieved in terms of greenhouse gas mitigation. The most suitable coal basins in Australia for CO2 storage include the Galilee, Cooper and Bowen-Surat basins in Queensland, and the Sydney, Gunnedah, and Clarence-Moreton Basins in New South Wales. Brief examples of geological storage within saline aquifers and coal seams in the Bowen and Surat basins, Queensland Australia, are described in this paper to compare and contrast each storage option.

This GHGT-12 conference paper hightlights some results of GA's work on "Regional assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the Mesozoic sucession in the Petrel Sub-basin, Northern Territory, Australia. Record 2014/11".

Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to the shipboard multibeam backscatter grids produced for the twelve survey areas (Areas A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1b and M1; 455 km2).

Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin (see eCat record 83199 for full details: see link right). The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to imagery data acquired from the ROVs downward facing camera during survey GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411. For the purposes of underwater imaging, the ROV was fitted with two video channels with pan and tilt, one colour Charged Coupled Device (CCD) camera, one low-light, black and white camera, one rear camera, one zoom camera, one downward facing digital HD video/stills camera, and two downward-facing lasers for scaling. Lighting was provided by four 150 W quartz-halogen lights. The ROV was deployed in a side entry garage Tether Management System (TMS) (100 m of tether cable) from the port side of the RV Tangaroa using a Launch and Recovery System (comprising a marine crane, umbilical winch and hydraulic power pack). During a `typical' deployment, the TMS was positioned approximately 20 m above the seabed, while the ROV surveyed a pre-determined transit line below the TMS at an altitude of 0.5 to 2 m above the seabed. Eight vectorised horizontal thrusters and two vertical thrusters controlled ROV motion once away from the TMS. To correlate the position of seabed video and still images with physical features in the multibeam bathymetry, the position of the ROV was tracked using a HiPAP500 Ultra-short Baseline (USBL) acoustic tracking system. A beacon was initially attached to the ROV and on the latter half of operations to the TMS, which provided both Dynamic Positioning and ROV operators with a visual reference of the position of the TMS with respect to the ship and ROV. Video footage was transmitted in real-time via the ships network to various locations throughout the ship using the `Blue Iris' software package. Live video feed to the surface enabled science operators to monitor and broadly characterise the seabed environment and ROV operators to regulate the altitude of the TMS and ROV. High-resolution still photographs (captured opportunistically along each transect) were used in conjunction with the video footage to assist identification of biota and seabed features. Upon retrieval of the ROV, video and still images were downloaded and renamed by station and a sequential image number. In the folder 'TAN1411_ROV', still images (.jpg files) and video (AVCHD .m2ts files) are arranged by study area with sub-folders named according to mission number, station number, gear code and camera number (e.g. M2_070_ROVCAM_022 = still images acquired during ROV mission 2 at station 070). USBL files (.csv) are located in each sub-folder and provide continuous navigational information on location, time (including UTC) and depth of ROV still and video imagery. Two master .csv files are located in folder 'TAN1411_ROV'.